http://varjager.wordpress.com/2009/02/15/fejklorden-nazir-ahmed-stolt-over-sitt-tilltag/
Den så kallat moderata muslimen Lord Ahmed, föreslagen av Storbritanniens förre PM till en plats i brittiska Överhuset, en del av parlamentet, är mycket glad över att han lyckades hindra Geert Wilders från komma in i England och London för att visa sin film Fitna. Detta trots att Geert Wilders hade en inbjudan från en av lorderna. Nazir Ahmed menar att det låg i landet bästa att Geert Wilders förhindrades, eftersom hans film uppmanar till våld från muslimers och andra gruppers sida.
Detta sagt att samma man som bjudit in den neo-nazistiske Jöran Jermas att tala i parlamentet. (Läs LP:s blogginlägg: Geert Wilders, “Lord” Ahmed och Jöran Jermas Every Kinda People)
Han förnekar också i artikeln från den 13 februari i Guardian.co.uk med rubriken Wilders’ ban is in Britain’s best interest att han skulle ha hotat med att mobilisera 10 000-tals muslimer, och att det är falsifikation av The Spectators krönikör Melanie Phillips, och därmed blev givetvis lorden själv ett offer för ” hundreds of abusive emails, phone calls and threats from around the world to my office, my staff and myself.”
Saxat från artikeln:
“When I found out that Geert Wilders was planning to come to Britain and that Baroness Cox and Lord Pearson wanted to show his film, I wrote to the Home Office, the leader of the House of Lords and Black Rod to say that his presence would lead to the incitement of religious and racial hatred, which constitutes a public order offence.
I pointed out that Wilders is already facing a serious charge in his home country for inciting racial hatred. Furthermore, Cox and Pearson could hardly use an argument for free speech to justify giving him this platform because Wilders himself is calling for the banning of the Qur’an.”
Det finns just nu 216 kommentarer under artikeln i Guardian och jag har skummat en hel del av dem, men det är få som stöder “lordens” triumf:
“Listen, sunshine, we’ve had enough of you and this stinking government treating us like three year olds and telling us what we can see, hear, think and say. ENOUGH!
And you have NO right. You are not even an elected representative.”
“Sorry - can I just say in the most polite way possible that as a (relatively liberal) UK Muslim, I wish you had stayed out of this affair.
The whole episode has been a farce. There was no reasonable reason for the UK to deny him entry. They should’ve have let him, a few people would’ve watched his movie and he would’ve left. No big deal.
I particularly take issue with your last para:
The Quilliam Foundation says it disagrees with the ban, but it doesn’t represent the masses and it doesn’t have the support of the majority of the Muslim community. I represent views that I believe are in the best interests of our country.
I really am sick, tired and quite frankly bored with people like you claiming to speak on behalf on the ‘Muslim community’ - what does this term actually mean? Whether its you, or Inayat Bunglawala, or the Quillam Foundation, the reality is that there are many diverse and varying opinions within the British Muslim community no different to society at large. Someone like you can no more represent the Muslim community than Gordon Brown can represent British people’s views.”
“Furthermore, Cox and Pearson could hardly use an argument for free speech to justify giving him this platform because Wilders himself is calling for the banning of the Qur’an.
Huh? Just because someone is against free speech doesn’t mean that there is no free speech angle to not letting them speak. It means Wilders is a hypocrite, but that doesn’t mean that his right to free speech has been forfeited.
Fitna has been out for a while now and I am not aware of anyone having been inspired to commit violence by it.
It is also worth mentioning that whilst Lord Ahmed poses as a moderate who is shocked at the idea of inflammatory individuals being given a platform, he has in fact previously invited the neo-Nazi Jöran Jermas to give a talk in parliament.”
Would Charles Darwin pass your censorship test?
I think you need to be more robust.
This is how democracy works or would you prefer a medieval theocracy?
When you speak of the masses surely you are referring to an intolerant minority with egg-shell sensitivities or are you referring to the cowards who indulge them?
And lets not pretend. You don’t represent the country.
You represent New LABOUR.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/feb/13/geert-wilders-extremists-liberty-central
Britain’s Muslim peer crows over barring of Wilders from country, Jihad Watch
.
Varjagerbloggen:
Dhimmitude, Storbritannien! En svart dag för Europa
Bevara “friden” för de radikala islamisterna
Källa: Varjager (gästinlägg)
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar